<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WebDU 2007 &#8211; Day 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.sherifmansour.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=62" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.sherifmansour.com/?p=62</link>
	<description>... and anything '2.0'</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 10:03:16 +1000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: smalls blogger &#187; Blog Archive &#187; ScrapBlog - A &#8216;Web 2.0&#8242; Flex App</title>
		<link>http://blog.sherifmansour.com/?p=62&#038;cpage=1#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>smalls blogger &#187; Blog Archive &#187; ScrapBlog - A &#8216;Web 2.0&#8242; Flex App</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 05:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sherifmansour.com/?p=62#comment-64</guid>
		<description>[...] recently posted about Adobe Flex as I head a lot about it and got to play with it briefly during the WebDU [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] recently posted about Adobe Flex as I head a lot about it and got to play with it briefly during the WebDU [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Lane</title>
		<link>http://blog.sherifmansour.com/?p=62&#038;cpage=1#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Lane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 02:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sherifmansour.com/?p=62#comment-50</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s interesting to hear this perspective.  When I first attended in 2005 this conference was called MXDU and was only about Macromedia products.  Last year post-merger it was re-branded webDu and we saw the introduction of some token sessions on non-Adobe topics.  This year there was a much wider range of non-Adobe topics.  But the keynotes were definitely Adobe all the way.  I guess my biggest complaint would be that the keynotes aren&#039;t keynotes (most keynotes are used to set a theme that sessions then explore) but really product teasers.   We use a lot of Adobe technologies at work and consequently the dominance of Adobe works for us.  But it would be great to see webDu evolve to be more representative of what is happening in the Australian web development community.  This would also make it easier to justify come budget time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s interesting to hear this perspective.  When I first attended in 2005 this conference was called MXDU and was only about Macromedia products.  Last year post-merger it was re-branded webDu and we saw the introduction of some token sessions on non-Adobe topics.  This year there was a much wider range of non-Adobe topics.  But the keynotes were definitely Adobe all the way.  I guess my biggest complaint would be that the keynotes aren&#8217;t keynotes (most keynotes are used to set a theme that sessions then explore) but really product teasers.   We use a lot of Adobe technologies at work and consequently the dominance of Adobe works for us.  But it would be great to see webDu evolve to be more representative of what is happening in the Australian web development community.  This would also make it easier to justify come budget time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sherif</title>
		<link>http://blog.sherifmansour.com/?p=62&#038;cpage=1#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>Sherif</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 00:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sherifmansour.com/?p=62#comment-49</guid>
		<description>Ahh there you go, yes it is the same editor. Yeah, the whole day was defiantly run with a massive Adobe sales pitch. Which was fine, if it was labeled a &#039;Adobe Tech Conference&#039;, but it was labeled &#039;The Web Tech Conference&#039; - and really all the web technologies that were looked at were 80% Adobe, but then again - thats why you have a Gold Sponsor...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahh there you go, yes it is the same editor. Yeah, the whole day was defiantly run with a massive Adobe sales pitch. Which was fine, if it was labeled a &#8216;Adobe Tech Conference&#8217;, but it was labeled &#8216;The Web Tech Conference&#8217; &#8211; and really all the web technologies that were looked at were 80% Adobe, but then again &#8211; thats why you have a Gold Sponsor&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Barber</title>
		<link>http://blog.sherifmansour.com/?p=62&#038;cpage=1#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Barber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2007 08:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sherifmansour.com/?p=62#comment-47</guid>
		<description>Its was more than a rip of the FCK Editor, it was the same editor. 

Yes the Coldfusion Community is a little -&#039;tight&#039;. 

Personally I think there was too much Adobe hype.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its was more than a rip of the FCK Editor, it was the same editor. </p>
<p>Yes the Coldfusion Community is a little -&#8217;tight&#8217;. </p>
<p>Personally I think there was too much Adobe hype.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
