<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Retweet and PageRank have in common</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.sherifmansour.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=490" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.sherifmansour.com/?p=490</link>
	<description>... and anything '2.0'</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 10:03:16 +1000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lawrence Krubner</title>
		<link>http://blog.sherifmansour.com/?p=490&#038;cpage=1#comment-45704</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawrence Krubner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 05:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sherifmansour.com/?p=490#comment-45704</guid>
		<description>Sherif, that is a great point. I hadn&#039;t really put it into words before, I think you sum up my main problem with Twitter - the lack of any kind of quality filter, the lack of reputation, the lack of anything like PageRank. That is what Twitter needs. Your analysis of the situation is very accurate I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sherif, that is a great point. I hadn&#8217;t really put it into words before, I think you sum up my main problem with Twitter &#8211; the lack of any kind of quality filter, the lack of reputation, the lack of anything like PageRank. That is what Twitter needs. Your analysis of the situation is very accurate I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://blog.sherifmansour.com/?p=490&#038;cpage=1#comment-44769</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 11:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sherifmansour.com/?p=490#comment-44769</guid>
		<description>Good article! Made me wonder, could microblogging be the best way to provide search results for internal corporate content which isn&#039;t indexed well (or at all) and doesn&#039;t have other things like tags or ratings/&#039;like&#039; functionality...?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article! Made me wonder, could microblogging be the best way to provide search results for internal corporate content which isn&#8217;t indexed well (or at all) and doesn&#8217;t have other things like tags or ratings/&#8217;like&#8217; functionality&#8230;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
